I have drafted and re-redrafted responses to what my uncle and others said on my blog a number of months ago about a Christian's proper role in politics. I am now more than willing to admit that parts of my original post was a bit inflammatory and overstated, and I apologize to any politically active Christians I've offended as a result. I did not intend to say that any Christian involved in politics is a self-seeking hypocrite, but I think it sounded like that. There is a respectable argument to be made for the idea that God holds Christians accountable for laws they have some responsibility in making. I'm just not really sure I agree with a lot of Christians on what that accountability means or how it ought to play out in our lives.
By way of explaining my last post a bit: My reaction was to a number of examples I have seen where political activism seems to have basically supplanted evangelism, and often for ignoble reasons. That gets me pretty upset. Whether you think political action is part of our responsibility as Christians or not, it would be difficult to argue that it is a greater responsibility than our responsibility to win hearts for Christ.
To be honest, though, I am not sure what I think a Christian's political responsibility entails in our day and age, aside from politics not being the defining role of a Christian in the world. A Christian's responsibility in a truly republican government—and a secular one, at that--is a tough concept to define. It is not made any easier by the fact that we are in a unique position in history in that Christians, as individuals, have some say in the decisions of the government and its laws, while the church itself as a body and an institution does not. The uniqueness of the situation makes it difficult to extrapolate guidelines from the Bible. While there are examples in the Bible of believers who participated in secular government (such as the centurion), it is not often clear how they did it, or how they applied Biblical principles to their position. It seems to me that the theocracy of the Old Testament and descriptions of the future millennial rule of Christ are not necessarily examples of government that can or ought to be followed in our particular situation. When it comes to looking for practical suggestions for those of us whose government is not directly or even indirectly ruled by God (in addition to His sovereignty over everything that happens), the Bible does not seem very clear.
Reading the discussion a few months ago on my blog and a recent discussion on the WORLD magazine blog on the same topic, I have felt as if a lot of us are talking right past one another without addressing some of the basic premises and presuppositions behind our disagreement. Plus, I just don't know where I stand enough to give a treatise of my own thinking another shot. I keep changing my mind. Since my uncle thinks I get many things wrong on a "fundamental level," let's strip the discussion to the fundamentals. Although it is difficult to discern a biblical approach to our particular situation in time and space, it is certainly not impossible. This will be the first post in a series with questions that anyone with an opinion on this should answer. I'm not going to claim that these questions are completely free from my own presuppositions, but I hope that they can get us a little closer to the heart of the matter. Please try to back up your arguments with scripture whenever you can:
- How do you pray for our government?
- Getting back to one of the very basic questions inherent to this debate: Is there a doctrinal or theological basis for Christian's being held accountable for the laws and their enforcement in a state in which they have some responsibility?
- To what extent does that accountability depend on the Christian's role in that state (king, voter, mayor, etc) and on the moral attitudes of the people being ruled? It seems reasonable that John Calvin, Constantine, George W, and Miles Standish would all be held accountable for their political influence in different ways, not to mention biblical personages like Daniel and Paul. Does our role as American Christian voters change as the country becomes increasingly secular and immoral?
Posted by waltondammerung at June 28, 2006 7:48 PMWell, my comments in the previous exchange were blunt as well - but that's what blogging is all about, right?
I would also like to put into context my previous defense of what is called the Religious Right. I am, generally-speaking, appalled by the RR's understanding of political reality and their actions in response to that reality. At the same time, I nearly always defend them when they come under fire. Why? Because at least they're acting, however wrong-headedly. To me, the Religious Right is like the Polish cavalry charging the German Panzers in September 1939. You're glad somebody's doing it, but you don't expect success.
Now: to your latest post.
Probably the most important argument in that post is found in these two sentences: "It seems to me that the theocracy of the Old Testament and descriptions of the future millennial rule of Christ are not necessarily examples of government that can or ought to be followed in our particular situation. When it comes to looking for practical suggestions for those of us whose government is not directly or even indirectly ruled by God (in addition to His sovereignty over everything that happens), the Bible does not seem very clear."
This is the center - ground zero - of the whole question. Let me start by taking a short-cut in this matter: my view is that the teaching of Christ is normative for the believer in politics, and not the Old Testament.
With this stipulated, I think you make the mistake of thinking that Christ's kingdom is a future event. The teaching of Christ in the gospels is largely concerned with the kingdom, and He teaches that it is being established as He speaks. Of course, the *fullness* of Christ's kingdom is a future event and will take place at the end of history. But Christ's kingdom is established in the incarnation and resurrection, and is enacted on earth today, to the extent that Christians live that kingdom. The coming of the kingdom is not a future event, but is the definition of the historical era between the resurrection and the end of history.
Thus Jesus clearly states, following the resurrection, that: "all power in heaven and on earth has been given to me." All power necessarily includes all political power. Again, this is not something that will occur in the future, but is something that happened with the resurrection. While Christ distinguishes between God and Caesar, Caesar is ultimately under God's authority. And to the extent that Christians themselves are Caesar - whether as magistrates or as citizens - Christ's kingdom is established, if imperfectly.
The problem, I think, is that you are looking for a particular political program - the Israelite system of monarchy, for example - rather than what is essentially an existential relationship to politics. If a Christian had (somehow) become emperor of Rome at the time of Nero, his political responsibilities would have been quite different from a Christian who becomes president of the United States.
At the same time, there are political orders that are more godly than others. For example, becoming emperor of Rome in 60 AD meant accepting a unitary system of government, based on the authority of a single individual, an essentially a pagan understanding of political authority. However, becoming president today means accepting a divided system of government, based on a separation of powers, which is an idea that originates in the covenant-based division of authority in the Bible. The word "constitution" is a secular synonym for the word "covenant." The word "federal," as in federal government, comes from the Latin word foedus, which again means "covenant." The history is there for anyone who wants to read it.
In short, what distinguishes the United States is that we have a covenant-based government, an idea that can be traced to only one historical source.
This brings us to the biggest political lie of our time, which is that the word "secular" means non-religious. Actually, the word secular is an invention of Christianity and is meant to signify the distinction between church and state – or God and Caesar. But all government is religious, since the whole of reality is religious. There are not two realities. Even substitutes for religion, like Marxism-Leninism, or American liberalism, which deny that they are religious, are the functional equivalents of a religion. If they promulgate the illogical idea that their politics is non-religious, this because – as a matter of rhetoric – they wish to brand their opponents as being religious, while pretending that they themselves are not.
Of course, the fact that even most Christians have now bought into this modern definition of the word secular, as meaning non-religious, signifies just how deep the rot has gone within the church itself.
********
You also had some questions at the end of your post:
Amy - How do you pray for our government?
My answer - Generally I pray that right decisions be made in particular instances, which is probably not completely up to the standard implied by Paul.
Amy - Is there a doctrinal or theological basis for Christians being held accountable for the laws and their enforcement in a state in which they have some responsibility?
My answer - Yes. As I argued above, Christ's kingdom does not arrive at the end of time, but is already present insofar as Christians live out the meaning of the gospel. This means that, to the extent to which Christians have political responsibility, whether as magistrates or citizens, they establish Christ's kingdom - though, of course, not fully.
Amy - Is there a doctrinal or theological basis for Christians being held accountable for the laws and their enforcement in a state in which they have some responsibility?..... Does our role as American Christian voters change as the country becomes increasingly secular and immoral?
My answer - "All power in heaven and on earth has been given to me." That’s a pretty firm doctrinal basis. Further, as I said, the big lie of modern politics is that the word "secular" means non-religious. American society is not in the process of becoming more secular; it is in the process of becoming pagan. One religion is replacing another in America, even as eighty-five percent of Americans call themselves Christians, a designation which is being emptied of meaning. The political role of the believer, in this situation of essential religious decadence, changes to the extent to which the existential political situation changes. But I don’t think you can separate the decline and fall of constitutional – or covenantal – government in America from the decline and fall of Christian belief itself.
You need to get "To End All Wars" out. Al†hough it is not exactly an essay on how a Christian should deal with government, it is an excellent example of "At what price mercy" in which as a Christian, one has no control over the government at all (in this case the Japanese Army) but the Christian does have a witness, which albeit it is no control, it definitely is an influence. It is a really thought provoking story!
Posted by: Dad at July 8, 2006 4:54 PMHello boys ;-)
Somebody can give me url to the XRumer's homepage?
Or maybe some info...
Thank you very much!!!
P.S. Вот уроды...
Posted by: JeyramoXRu at October 16, 2008 11:37 PMEh.. Are you playing with my slimy dark I have a joke for you =) What do you call a day that follows two days of rain? Monday.
Posted by: ExiliaHib at November 2, 2008 9:31 PMHave you ever visited free dating sites. Which are the best?
Send me addresses please. I tried a lot of them with no luck in relationships.
I've Found a place. You will get Opt In & Survey Leads emailed to you 7 day a week
Leads are 100% opt in and have a ton of data including the time and date stamp so that you can use them in an auto-responder or just email them.
Many of them will have phone numbers so you can also call them if you want.
They have:
Full Name
Mailing Address
Email Address
IP Address
Date Stamp
http://trafficadd.net
Posted by: boryJeonnarar at November 22, 2008 4:55 AMHi
This is the best way to make cash while surfing the net.
No need to be "Actively" surfing
No need to "Click" banners
No limit to how many hours
http://22add.com
Posted by: liesTuptneupe at November 24, 2008 6:59 PMHi all Jamie here 23 UK , just thought I would introduce myself first beore posting and helpful learn some things and help others.
Posted by: Vithheavect at November 25, 2008 12:15 PMI initiate a ensemble sort of soups that valid grand, and can be made in big batches and frozen.
Is there any interest?
Most Popular Forex Platform
Currency trading platform, Anywhere in the world
All you need is a computer and internet connection
http://newhostbg.com
Hello Id Like to fly you this odd potentiality !
How adjacent to by we try something a inappreciable new this without linger ?
perodds something like this ?
http://www.weubfngfsd.com
If you want to have a lighter skin tone, wipe out age from your skin and possess a hefty and radiantly luminating body, this is the the answer. It doesn't only give you a celebrity-like skin and a healthy body, but it is also very safe compared to conventional remedies like hydroquinone, bleaching products and the likes.
Check us out and discover the secret!
Thanks so much,
Karen
http://www.whitening-capsules.com
90% Christmas discount!
Our website offers a range of wonderful gifts for various occasions such as holidays,
weddings, birthdays, wedding anniversary, graduations, kids and other special occasions. Buy millions gifts.
Secure purchase and friendly support guaranteed
http://www.millionstocks.com
Posted by: floamyodoff at December 1, 2008 7:00 AMThe Google Game Is Over! The Most Profitable Ppc Champion Is Here To Stay...
No More Wasting Dollars On Poor Performing Campaigns...
IMPORTANT: Read this, because the doors
to Yahoo Cash won't stay open for long.
Itwent live yesterday, and the 300 spots are already vanishing.
You can spend thousands on Google Adwords ads, or you
can spend pennies on Yahoo where the competition's less
and the payoffs can be huge. Yahoo Cash shows
you how to do it.
If you're in a hurry, just go here and see why people
are saying this is the perfect system for anybody to
start squeezing maximum profits from PPC ads on Yahoo:
*************************************************
WHY THIS IS SO URGENT
*************************************************
They're only releasing 300 copies of the system every
three months so they can provide excellent customer
support. That's not a gimmick--they mean it. When those
spots are gone, they're gone.
That's why you need to get over there, see why this is
like striking gold, and jump on this before the 300
spots disappear.
*************************************************
This is the system that helped these guys milk over
$463,000 from ClickBank. Here's the link to check it
out for yourself:
http://softflirt.com
All the best!